Legal Opinion
Diebold, Inc. v. Marshall
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 3, 1978No. 76-1278PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALINSKI, District Judge.
Petitioner Diebold, Inc. seeks judicial review of a decision by the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (hereinafter “the Commission”) that Diebold has violated a safety regulation promulgated by the Secretary of Labor pursuant to the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, 29 U.S.C. §§ 651-78 (hereinafter “the Act”). Diebold contends that the Commission erred in its interpretation of the applicable regulations and that, even if the Commission’s interpretation is correct, the regulations are so vague as to be unenforceable under the due process clause…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Gandee v. GlaserDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992
- Record Revolution No. 6, Inc. v. City of ParmaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- Precious Metals Associates, Inc. v. Commodity Futures Trading CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- United Nuclear Corp. v. CannonDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1982
- Bokum Resources Corp. v. New Mexico Water Quality Control CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.