Legal Opinion
Unilab Corp. v. Angeles-IPA CA2/4
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 13, 2016No. B255136UnpublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EPSTEIN, P. J.
Plaintiff Unilab Corporation, doing business as Quest Diagnostics (Quest), seeks payment from defendant Angeles-IPA (Angeles) for out-of-network laboratory testing services that were ordered by in-network physicians for Angeles patients. Quest presented several theories, including breach of implied contract, unjust enrichment, quantum meruit, and common counts. Angeles moved for summary adjudication, which the trial court granted as to all but two causes of action that were subsequently dismissed by Quest. Judgment was entered for Angeles based on the summary adjudication…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- McBride v. BoughtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- First Nationwide Savings v. PerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Silva v. Providence Hospital of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- California Medical Ass'n v. Aetna U.S. Healthcare of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Westside Estate Agency, Inc. v. RandallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Welborne v. Ryman-Carroll Found., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Avetisyan v. Drinker Biddle & Reath CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2021
- City of Oakland v. The Oakland RaidersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Diaz v. Sohnen EnterprisesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.