Quality Care, Inc. v. Rosa
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 to review an order of the Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human Rights, dated August 16, 1990, which, after a hearing, (1) found that the petitioner had discriminated against the complainant Vernita Bing because of her race and color and (2) awarded her back pay and the sum of $10,000 in compensatory damages for mental anguish and humiliation.
Adjudged that the petition is granted, on the law, without costs or disbursements, to the extent that the Commissioner’s order is modified by deleting therefrom the third numbered subparagraph…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of New York v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- State Division of Human Rights v. County of Onondaga Sheriff's DepartmentNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- CUNY-Hostos Community College v. State Human Rights Appeal BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Cosmos Forms, Ltd. v. State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Barton v. New York City Commission On Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Luciano v. Olsten Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- Funk v. F & K SUPPLY, INC.District Court, N.D. New York · 1999
- Brady v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- Shea v. IcelandairDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- McIntosh v. Irving Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.