Funk v. F & K SUPPLY, INC.
District Court, N.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM — DECISION & ORDER
McAVOY, Chief Judge.
Pending before the Court are plaintiffs’ and defendants’ post-trial motions in this sex discrimination case. Defendants move for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Fed.R.CivP. 50(b), or, alternatively, a new trial pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(a). Plaintiffs oppose defendants’ motion, and move in their own right for attorneys’ fees, expenses and costs.
For the reasons that follow, defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part, and plaintiffs’ motion is granted as modified herein.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Shirleyanne Funk and Linda…
2Cases cited107 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Turley v. ISG Lackawanna, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Zimmermann v. Associates First Capital Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Wahlstrom v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Cowan v. City of Mount VernonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Gonzalez v. BrattonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.