Seidel v. Chick
Oregon Supreme Court
From Lane: Lawrence T. Harris, Judge. Statement by Mr. Justice Burnett. This is a proceeding by Emma Seidel, guardian of Ida E. Seidel, Charles A. Seidel and Nellie Hazel Seidel, for the sale of certain lands belonging to her wards.
Read the full summary
From Lane: Lawrence T. Harris, Judge. Statement by Mr. Justice Burnett. This is a proceeding by Emma Seidel, guardian of Ida E. Seidel, Charles A. Seidel and Nellie Hazel Seidel, for the sale of certain lands belonging to her wards. Acting in pursuance of Section 1359 et seq., L. 0. L., relating to sales by foreign guardians of the lands of their wards situated in this State, Emma Seidel, a Missouri guardian of her minor children, residing in that State but owning land in Oregon, procured from the county court of Lane County a license under date of July 8, 1910, authorizing her to sell the…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett
1. The county court was a tribunal of competent original jurisdiction in the matter under consideration. Both the persons and the subject-matter involved were properly within its control by virtue of proceedings al*324ready had. It therefore had the power to decide rightly or wrongly in the matter of the confirmation of the sale of the property to Chick for $6,100. Conceding, without deciding, that Chick had a right to appeal from this order of confirmation, he did not exercise this right, but appealed only from the decision of the county court denying his motion. He thus abandoned one of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Butterick v. RichardsonOregon Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Shepherd's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1935
- Lane County Escrow Service, Inc. v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Waldow v. WaldowOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Lachele v. Oregon Realty Exchange Investment Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Mannix v. HarjuOregon Supreme Court · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.