Legal Opinion

Goss v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1964No. 235PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOND, Justice.

Appellant was convicted of petty larceny. On this appeal he contends that the court below erred (1) in denying his motion to dismiss for want of a speedy trial, and (2)' in permitting the introduction of evidence which appellant claims was obtained b’y an illegal search and seizure.

Speedy Trial

Appellant’s trial did not take place until nearly fourteen months after he was indicted. He contends that his constitutional right to a speedy trial 1 was violated and, therefore, that the court ought to have granted his motion to dismiss the indictment under Criminal Rule 43(b). 2

In…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Rios v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Husty v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. United States v. Jack A. LustmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Coleman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Erickson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  3. McCoy v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  4. People v. TaggartNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Rutherford v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API