Schenk v. Dunkelow
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Leelanaw. (Ramsdell, J.) Trespass. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, C. J.
The plaintiff brings her action in this case against the defendant for trespass to her person, charging him, in her declaration, with an assault and battery, accompanied with very aggravating circumstances of ravishment, resulting in pregnancy and the subsequent birth of a child. The defendant pleaded the general issue.
The case was tried at the May term of the circuit court last year, in the county of Leelanaw, before a jury, and *90resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff for the sum of $1,500.
The defendant asks a review of the case in this Court, and presents nine assignments of error upon the…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Totten v. TottenMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Watson v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Jensen v. LawrenceWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Adams v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
- Kramer v. WeigandNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.