Legal Opinion

Miltimore v. City of Augusta

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 8, 1934No. 31,811PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This is an appeal and a cross-appeal from a judgment increasing a condemnation award for the taking of certain lands to make a reservoir for a water supply for the city of Augusta.

Briefly the facts were these: The plaintiff owned a 160-acre farm about two miles north of Augusta, consisting partly of good agricultural bottom land and partly of upland suitable mostly for pasture and hay meadow. The farm buildings were somewhat poor and run down, probably because the owner had been in a sanatorium for some years and the premises had been…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. City of New York v. SageSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. McGovern v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Clark’s Ferry Bridge Co. v. Public Service Commission of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Glover v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  2. Paul v. Western Distributing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  3. Urban Renewal Agency v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  4. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. LoopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Saathoff v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API