Legal Opinion
Kinsey v. Knapp
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided December 6, 1957No. 13179PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PICARD, District Judge.
Plaintiffs move this court, pursuant to Rule 54(b), F.R.C.P., 28 U.S.C.A. to invalidate a voting trust agreement while reserving judgment on damages and other related issues of fact raised by their complaint.
Findings of Fact.
All plaintiffs are stockholders of Monroe Paper Products Company, and plaintiff Kinsey is, in addition, a director. Defendants, Knapp, Blum, Raney, Leathers and Sempliner are directors and also trustees under the above voting trust agreement. Defendant Huber, neither a trustee nor director, was chairman of the stockholders’ committee which allegedly…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Deckert v. Independence Shares Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. McKesson & Robbins, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Burton S. Knapp v. John P. Kinsey, John P. Kinsey v. Burton S. KnappCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
- Reserve Life Insurance Company v. Provident Life Insurance Company Et Al.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- Disher v. FulgoniAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- McGraw v. Liberty Airlines, Inc. (In Re Bell & Beckwith)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1988
- McCloskey v. McCloskeyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.