Legal Opinion

Santiago Herminio Gonzalez Y Barredo v. Edelmira Folla Schenck, Individually, and as of the Last Will and Testament of Maria Cintas Folla

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 24, 1970No. 321, Docket 33496PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLING, District Judge:

Plaintiff, a practicing lawyer in Havana, Cuba, now resident in the United States, sued on a contingent fee retainer agreement for twenty percent of a settlement in the amount of $1,100,000 and interest which the defendant executrix had received in 1962 for a release of all of the claims of her testatrix to share in the intestate property of her deceased brother Oscar Cintas, a national and resident of Cuba who died in Cuba on May 11, 1957. Alternatively plaintiff sued in quantum, meruit.

The trial judge denied any recovery. He made elaborate and careful findings of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Matter of TillmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Intercontinental Hotels Corp. v. GoldenNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. Matter of KrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Matter of SnyderNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. Oltarsh v. Aetna InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hermine Hanlin v. Marvin M. MitchelsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  2. Schnabel v. Taft Broadcasting Company, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. American Optical Co. v. CurtissDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
  4. Levisohn, Lerner, Berger & Langsam v. Medical Taping Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  5. Neely v. Hollywood Marine, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API