Legal Opinion
Bagnola v. Smithkline Beecham Clinical Laboratories
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided August 23, 2002No. 1-00-0224 RelPublished
1Opinion of the Court 1
SIXTH DIVISION
August 23, 2002
No. 1-00-0224
JAMES A. BAGNOLA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CLINICAL LABORATORIES, and CITY OF CHICAGO, a Municipal Corporation,
Defendants-Appellees.))))))))))
Appeal from the
Circuit Court of
Cook County
Honorable
Sophia Hall,
Judge Presiding.
2Opinion of the Court · FrossardJustice O'Mara Frossard
Plaintiff, James Bagnola, appeals an entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants, SmithKline Beecham Clinical Laboratories (SBCL) and the City of Chicago (City) on his cause of action for spoliation of evidence. In 1991, the Chicago police department ordered plaintiff, a Chicago police officer, to submit to random…
3Cases cited17 opinions
- Purtill v. HessIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
- River Park, Inc. v. City of Highland ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- Boyd v. Travelers InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- Rein v. David A. Noyes & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
- Rodgers v. St. Mary's Hosp. of DecaturIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.