Ricks v. . Woodward
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendant from Cline, J., at Spring Term, 1912, of NORTHAMPTON. Civil action to determine boundary line between two- tracts of land. There was verdict for plaintiff. Judgment on verdict, and defendant excepted and appealed. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion of tbe Court by Mr. Justice Holce.
1Opinion of the CourtHoke, J.
Tbe suit involved tbe correct location of a divisional line between two adjoining tracts of land in said county, tbe Barnes tract and tbe Tyner tract. Under a charge, to wbicb no exceptions were taken, the jury established tbe line as contended for by tbe plaintiff, and we find no exceptions on tbe record wbicb may be allowed for reversible error. In tbe progress of tbe trial, evidence was admitted from several witnesses tending to establish a general reputation that tbe true dividing-line was located as claimed by plaintiff. Tbe reception of this evidence was urged for error, tbe objection…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Shaffer v. GaynorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- State v. Ledford.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Hemphill v. Hemphill.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Westfelt v. Adams.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- Lamb v. . CopelandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- R. R. v. . Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Wooten v. Grand United Order of Odd FellowsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Singleton v. . RoebuckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Pope v. . PopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Adam v. Columbian National Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1920
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.