Legal Opinion
In Re Shin
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 13, 2004No. 02-00357PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER RE SECOND AMENDED PLAN
S. MARTIN TEEL, JR., Bankruptcy Judge.
At the confirmation hearing on his First Amended Reorganization Plan,, the debtor, Dr. Peter C. Shin, filed a second Amended Reorganization Plan (Docket Entry No. 129) (“Second Amended Plan”) 1 under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (11 U.S.C.). 2 The debtor must modify the Second Amended Plan for the reasons that follow, unless the debtor (who has not had an opportunity to address these issues) files a motion convincing the court that its analysis is in error.
I
THE PLAN MAKES NO PROVISION FOR NON-TAX CLAIMS…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Norwest Bank Worthington v. AhlersSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- In Re Mammoth Mart, Inc., Debtor. Stanley Cramer v. Mammoth Mart, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- Young v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Alberts v. Tuft (In Re Greater Southeast Community Hospital Corp.)District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- In Re Adelphia Communications Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- In Re HendersonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2005
- Suntrust Bank v. Roberson ( in Re Baseline Sports, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008
- In re MolinaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.