Legal Opinion

Falleo v. Byrolly Transportation Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 10, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.

These appeals are based solely upon the claim that the trial court erred in setting aside the verdicts of the jury. The memorandum of decision concludes: “I fail to find evidence from which the' jury could have found that the defendant’s driver was negligent. The verdicts are therefore set aside.” A very brief reference is made to the action of the defendant’s driver, as the court believed it to have been proved, and it is characterized as the conduct of a reasonably prudent man. There is no intimation that the jury, in reaching an opposite conclusion, had acted from motives of prejudice,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Caviote v. SheaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  2. Frisbie v. SchintoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  3. Glazer v. RosoffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API