Legal Opinion

State v. Bache

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 7, 2008No. Nos. 26262-6-III; 26263-4-IIIPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

¶1 The State must prove the essential elements of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt. Here, the State charged the defendant with one count of indecent exposure and one count of communication with a minor for immoral purposes. The State also alleged that the defendant had previously been convicted of these same crimes. The previous convictions elevated these current charges from misdemeanors to felonies. The court did not, however, instruct the jury that prior convictions were essential elements of the crimes; nor did it otherwise require the State to prove the prior convictions. We conclude…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1997

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Personal Restraint Petition Of Gary Daniel MeredithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API