Legal Opinion

Ratliff v. Stewart

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 13, 2007No. 06-61018PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

In her suit alleging she was harmed by a dangerous drug, Sarah Ratliff, instead of suing Edsel Stewart, the doctor who had prescribed the drug, sued Lawrence Stewart, his son and also a physician. The district court concluded that “the plaintiffs counsel’s conduct was totally without basis in law or fact and that plaintiffs counsel unnecessarily and vexatiously multiplied the proceedings in this matter at the expense of defendant Stewart.” The court awarded Stewart attorneys’ fees and expenses to be paid by Ratliffs counsel, who appeal, arguing that the court was…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  5. Willy v. Coastal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Qureshi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  2. R. Reginald Hyde, II v. George IrishCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  3. Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad v. SchiefferCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  4. Chandler v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2018
  5. MacIas v. Aaron Rents, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API