Legal Opinion

Bratt v. Poole

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1919No. 15135PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Card, J., entered March 30, 1918, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for damages and for the rental of a donkey engine.

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

In January, 1916, appellant leased to respondent Poole and one Powell a donkey engine for use in logging operations. The lease was in writing, duly signed, the term was seven months, and the lessees were bound to accept the engine “in present condition,” to pay a rental of $75 per month in advance, and to return the engine, within ten days after the termination of the lease, to any place designated by *566lessor within fifty miles of the city of Tacoma “in as good order and condition as the same is now, or may be put into (reasonable use and wear thereof excepted).” It is admitted that, after the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Direct Navigation Co. v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
  2. Robertson v. Plymouth Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Chas. H. Lilly Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Metropolitan Park District v. Olympia Athletic Club, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Metropolitan Park District v. Olympia Athletic Club, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Chas. H. Lilly Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API