Legal Opinion
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Chas. H. Lilly Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 15, 1956No. 33003Published
1Opinion of the Court
48 Wn.2d 528 (1956)
295 P.2d 299
ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent,
v.
THE CHAS. H. LILLY COMPANY, Appellant.[1]
No. 33003.
The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
March 15, 1956.
Jones & Grey, for appellant.
McMicken, Rupp & Schweppe and Warren A. Doolittle, for respondent.
Cornelius J. Peck, amicus curiae.
ON REHEARING
FINLEY, J.
The facts involved are adequately set forth in the opinion previously filed in this matter on June 30, 1955, which appears in 46 Wn. (2d) 840, 286 P. (2d) 107.
[1] In a simple bailment which is for the mutual benefit of both bailor and bailee, where the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Young v. . LearyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Direct Navigation Co. v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
- Loeb v. FerberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Chas. H. Lilly Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1955
- Locomotive Exchange, Inc. v. Rucker Bros.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.