Legal Opinion
Benally v. Hodel
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 13, 1990No. 88-15244PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:
Appellants, individual members of the Navajo Tribe, timely appeal from the district court’s order dismissing their first amended complaint on the ground that they lack standing. We affirm.
I
In their amended complaint, appellants allege that the Secretary of the Interior, other agents of the Department of the Interior, and the Navajo-Hopi Relocation Commission (“the Relocation Commission”)1 have failed to comply with the mandates of the Navajo and Hopi Indian Settlement Act (“the Settlement Act”), 25 U.S.C. § 640d et seq., and the Uniform Relocation…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of BellwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- City of Davis, a Municipal Corporation v. William T. Coleman, Jr., Secretary of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Clinton v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Resources Limited, Inc. v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Mt. Graham Red Squirrel v. EspyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Salmon River Concerned Citizens v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Mallas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.