Legal Opinion

Sentz v. Crabbs

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 2, 1993No. 517PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMILIA, Judge:

The appellants, Donald J. and Melody Crabbs and Bryan S. and Leatha Ketterman, appeal from the June 19, 1992 Order dismissing their exceptions to and making final the decree nisi entered February 13, 1992, following a nonjury trial at which it was found plaintiffs/appellees held an easement by implication over an undeveloped borough alleyway which abutted appellants’ property on the south and appellees’ lots on the north.

In finding there existed an easement by implication in appellees’ favor, the court reasoned that although the plaintiffs were unable to establish definitively…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hercules v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Auman v. GrimesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. King v. RockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Phillippi v. KnotterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Possessky v. DiemSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Kao v. HaldemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Martin v. Sun Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Velazquez v. GuptaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API