United States v. Pechefsky
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
KASTL, Judge:
Three issues require our consideration: (1) Did the accused’s false making of the signature of his commander to a credit rec*815ommendation constitute service-discrediting conduct under Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934 (UCMJ)? (2) Was there a valid apprehension of the accused, based on probable cause? and (3) Was the strip-search of the accused, conducted two hours after the initial pat-down search, valid as incident to apprehension? Finding no error, we affirm.1
I
Forged Credit Recommendation
The accused, stationed in England, was charged with…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Rafaela Monclavo-CruzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. KinaneUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. WhalenU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1983
- United States v. ShepherdU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987