Legal Opinion

Gigos v. Cochran

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1876PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Ripley Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Howk, In

In this action, the appellants were the plaintiffs, and the appellees were the defendants, ip the court below. All of the appellants’ complaint, which is set out in the record, is contained in what is called an amended third paragraph of the complaint.

In this amended third paragraph, it is alleged, in substance, that one Blossius Gigos, on the-day of-, 1860, departed this life leaving the appellants as his only surviving heirs and representatives; that on the 9th day of August, 1853, George W. Cochran was the owner of the north-west quarter of section twenty-two, in town eight, north,…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lowe v. TurpieIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Marriner v. DennisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Halstead v. Board of Comm'rsIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Armstrong v. ShortIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Pennsylvania Co. v. ColeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API