Legal Opinion
CARTER v. EUREKA MULTIFAMILY GROUP
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 3, 2024No. 2:22-cv-01429Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ALIA CARTER, 2:22-CV-01429-CCW Plaintiff, v. EUREKA MULTIFAMILY GROUP, Defendant. OPINION Plaintiff Alia Carter claims that her former employer, Eureka Multifamily Group, discriminated against her on the basis of her race (African American) by altering her job duties, placing her on paid leave, and ultimately terminating her, and that Eureka retaliated against her for engaging in protected activity, all in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and Title
42, U.S.C. § 1981. Eureka has moved for summary judgment…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.