Legal Opinion
Steever v. Bristol-Myers Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided November 6, 1989No. Civ. A. HAR 88-3075PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HARGROVE, District Judge.
Currently pending before this Court is Defendants Bristol-Myers Company’s (“Bristol-Myers”) and William F. Flatley’s (“Flatley”) Motion for Summary Judgment. The issues have been fully briefed. No hearing on this motion is deemed necessary. Local Rule 105.6.
I
In June, 1979, Steever became employed by Bristol-Myers in its United States Pharmaceutical and Nutrition Group, Mead Johnson, as a sales representative. Her duties in this position required her to do extensive driving and repeated lifting of packages weighing in excess of 20 lbs.
In 1985, Steever…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hebra A. Berry v. Ciba-Geigy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Gaynell Boyd v. Trustees of the United Mine Workers Health & Retirement FundsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ralph Block v. Pitney Bowes Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Marcum v. ZimmerDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1995
- Roy v. Northwestern National Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1997
- Saah v. Contel Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1991
- Weber v. St. Louis UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.