Legal Opinion
United States v. Tommy Wayne Miller, United States of America v. Jack Atkins, A/K/A Jack Tippitt
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 12, 1974No. 73-1866, 73-1868PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*363CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge.
In No. 73-1866, defendant Miller pleaded guilty to a violation of the Dyer Act (18 U.S.C. § 2312). The district court ordered that a presentence investigation be conducted, and the prior criminal record portion of the ensuing presen-tence report was sent to defense counsel. Prior to sentencing, defendant filed a motion requesting permission to examine the entire presentence report on the ground that he could not otherwise “receive a fair sentence.” At the time of sentencing, this motion was denied.
At the sentencing hearing, defense counsel explained that defendant had…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Eliseo Espinoza, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Charles Dallas Baker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Nimrod Solomon and George SommerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Irving L. NapueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Photovest Corporation, an Indiana Corporation, and Cross-Appellant v. Fotomat Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- United States v. James Bass, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Gary Woody, United States of America v. Blanchard L. SavantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Roy L. McCoyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.