Legal Opinion

Talbot v. Dillard

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 2, 1899PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Bowie. Tried below before Hon. R. H. Jones.

1Opinion of the Court

FINLEY, Chief Justice.

—This is a suit on a promissory note by appellee against appellants as indorsers for one Mrs. M. Levy. Appellant C. H. Moores pleaded non est factum as to his purported indorsement. The single question upon which he appeals is the sufficiency of the evidence to overcome his plea and authorize judgment against him. There are no findings of fact by the court.

The only error assigned by this appellant is as follows: “The court erred in rendering judgment against this defendant, because the plea of non est factum and the great preponderance of the evidence showed that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. UpshawTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Williams v. CongerSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Hanley v. GandyTexas Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Campbell v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  2. Joffre v. MynattCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  3. Tarwater v. Donley County State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Goodman v. W. S. Peck & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Amthon v. First State Bank of UvaldeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API