Legal Opinion

St. Julian v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 18, 1993No. A14-92-00394-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAJORITY OPINION

LEE, Justice.

Appellant was charged with two counts of burglary of a building with intent to commit theft, each enhanced with a prior felony conviction. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty and waived his right to a jury trial. The trial court found appellant guilty of both counts. After pleading not true to the enhancement allegations, the trial court found both enhancements to be true and sentenced appellant to twenty years confinement on each count. We affirm.

In three points of error, appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction where the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Ellett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. MacK v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996
  2. St. Julian v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Albin Adalin Zelaya -Zelaya v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
  4. Fletcher Kevin MacK v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API