Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Warnock

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided December 31, 1991No. 254-94-8378PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FOREMAN, Senior Judge:

A special court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members convicted the appellant, contrary to his pleas, of adultery (Specification 1 of the Charge), and photographing a female officer in the nude and showing the negatives to a junior enlisted soldier (Specification 2 of the Charge), in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The approved sentence provides for reduction to pay grade E-3 and forfeiture of $612.00 pay per month for four months. The Judge Advocate General has referred…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. Sacher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. United States v. SadinskyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  5. United States v. GiordanoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. FarenceU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002
  2. United States v. AcostaNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
  3. United States v. WomackU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
  4. Dew v. United StatesArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998
  5. United States v. FarenceU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API