Legal Opinion

Pfau v. Public Employment Relations Board

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 2009PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Eugene P. Devine, J.

Petitioner Ann Pfau, as Chief Administrative Judge of the Courts of the Unified Court System of the State of New York (UCS), challenges respondent New York State Public Employment Relations Board’s (PERB) May 20, 2008 determination of an improper practice charge filed against petitioner by intervenor-respondent District Council 37, AFSCME, AFL-CIO (Council 37).

In its improper practice charge, Council 37 claimed that petitioner’s refusal to comply with Council 37’s document demands in a disciplinary proceeding against one of Council 37’s members violated…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. New York City Transit Authority v. New York State Public Employment Relations BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. New York State Public Employment Relations BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. State of New York Public Employment Relations BoardNew York Supreme Court · 2006

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pfau v. Public Employment Relations BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API