Legal Opinion

Zarati SS Co. v. Park Bridge Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 20, 1946No. 135, 184Published

1Opinion of the Court

154 F.2d 377 (1946)

ZARATI S. S. CO.

v.

PARK BRIDGE CORPORATION et al.

Nos. 135, 184.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

March 20, 1946.

Hill, Rivkins & Middleton, of New York City (George B. Warburton, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Benjamin Siegel of New York City (Benjamin Siegel and Benjamin Brownstein, both of New York City, on the brief), for Howard Smith & Co., Inc., defendant-appellee.

Abraham L. Pomerantz, of New York City (William E. Haudek, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee Park Bridge Corporation.

Before SWAN, CHASE, and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

CHASE,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Reeves v. BeardallSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Hohorst v. Hamburg-American Packet Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API