Legal Opinion

Albertson's, Inc. v. Ortiz

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 11, 1993No. 3-92-393-CVPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEA ANN SMITH, Justice.

Albertson’s, Inc. appeals an adverse judgment rendered on a jury verdict awarding damages to Rachel Ortiz and John Downes (“appellees”). The principal issue presented is whether the Texas Constitution’s bill of rights is self-executing in creating a cause of action for damages for a private entity’s infringement of an individual’s free-speech rights. Concluding that the constitution creates no such tort action, we will reverse the judgment of the trial court and render judgment that appellees take nothing.

BACKGROUND

Since 1984 the United Farm Workers of America 1 (“UFW”)…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Davenport v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Gay Law Students Ass'n v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Binette v. SaboSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Tiernan v. Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Boyer v. Board of County Comr's of Johnson CountyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1996
  4. Allison v. City of Fort Worth, TexasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1999
  5. Tutt v. City of Abilene, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API