Vetter v. Rein
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.
Three questions are raised by the appellants which are particularly stated in the paragraphs devoted to their consideration:(1) The defendant insurance company by answer interposed a plea in abatement, the gist of which is that the company was improperly joined as a defendant because by the terms of its policy no cause of action had accrued against it when the action was commenced. The plaintiff did not demur to this plea, so that there is no implied admission of its truth. No reply to an answer is required and the allegations of the plea stand denied under our system of pleading. The plea is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chaperon v. Portland Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1902
- Chapleau v. Manhattan Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- Mendleson v. RensselaerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Overpeck v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
- Edge v. Third Avenue RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Laska v. SteinpreisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Wisconsin Telephone Co. v. ReynoldsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Kimball v. Antigo Building Supply Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Krueger v. SteffenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Hutt v. Lamont's Service, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.