Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Com.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 11, 2008No. Record 070640PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY Chief Justice LEROY R. HASSELL, SR.

I

Code § 46.2-357(A) states in relevant part:

"It shall be unlawful for any person determined or adjudicated an habitual offender to drive any motor vehicle or self-propelled machinery or equipment on the highways of the Commonwealth while the revocation of the person's driving privilege remains in effect."

The sole issue that we consider in this appeal of a judgment from the Court of Appeals is whether the Commonwealth proved beyond a reasonable doubt that a defendant, who was convicted for a violation of Code § 46.2-357, received actual notice that…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Commonwealth v. HudsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 2003
  3. Viney v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2005
  4. Powers v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1970
  5. Stokes v. Warden, Powhatan Correctional CenterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2011
  2. McMillan v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2009
  3. Ortiz v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2008
  4. Williams v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2010
  5. Atkins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API