Cohen v. Portland Lodge No. 142
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon
In Equity. The plaintiff is a minor, and seeks by this suit to redeem an undivided interest in lots 5 and 6, block 88, in the city of Portland, or, if impracticable, the whole thereof, from the alleged lien of a certain mortgage executed by Nathan Cohen and Rosa Cohen, his father and mother, to Joseph Hume, to secure originally the payment of the sum of S4,000 loaned by Hume to the said Nathan Cohen.
Read the full summary
In Equity. The plaintiff is a minor, and seeks by this suit to redeem an undivided interest in lots 5 and 6, block 88, in the city of Portland, or, if impracticable, the whole thereof, from the alleged lien of a certain mortgage executed by Nathan Cohen and Rosa Cohen, his father and mother, to Joseph Hume, to secure originally the payment of the sum of S4,000 loaned by Hume to the said Nathan Cohen. Subsequent to the execution of the mortgage Nathan died, leaving Rosa, his widow, and five children, one of whom has since deceased. Cohen left a will devising the property in question to…
1Opinion of the CourtWoeverton, District Judge
(after stating the facts). The affidavit upon which the order for publication is based was made by one of the attorneys for plaintiff in the foreclosure suit, and sets out:
“That the amended complaint in said suit was filed with the clerk of said court on the 19th day of November, 1897, and summons thereupon issued. * * * That said summons issued as aforesaid was delivered to the sheriff of Multnomah county, state of Oregon, with directions to said sheriff to serve the same upon the defendants and each of them, and said sheriff has returned said summons to the clerk of this court with his…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Galpin v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Morrill v. MorrillOregon Supreme Court · 1890
- Forbes v. HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Applegate v. Lexington & Carter County Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Crosbie v. BrewerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Quigley v. CreminSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Dixie Meadows Independence Mines Co. v. KightOregon Supreme Court · 1935
- Moore Realty Co. v. CarrOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Ranch v. WerleyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.