Legal Opinion

Stout v. Sutphen

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided January 11, 1943No. Docket 139/687PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John M. Wall and Marie Louise Stout were married in 1899, and sometime thereafter bank accounts were constituted to the credit of Marie Louise Wall and John M. Wall and the survivor of them as joint tenants, in the First National Bank and the Bound Brook Trust Company, both in Bound Brook, New Jersey, and also in West Side Savings Bank in New York City. Other than the records of these banking institutions which disclose the character of the accounts, there is no proof of the circumstances accompanying and surrounding their creation. All parties now in interest assume from the words used that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. John Agnew Co. v. Board of EducationNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1914
  2. New Jersey Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. ArchibaldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1919
  3. Brown v. Home Development Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1941
  4. Steinmetz v. SteinmetzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941
  5. Reeves v. ReevesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Forbes v. First Camden Nat. Bank & Trust Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  2. Stewart v. Harris Structural Steel Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
  3. Kamens v. FORTUGNONew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  4. Matter of Guardianship of RichSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Tobin v. Jersey Shore BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API