Legal Opinion

Larson v. State

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 8, 2011No. A10-485PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHUMAKER, Judge.

Appellant challenges the district court’s denial of his postconviction petition for relief from his 2002 conviction and sentence of felony test refusal, arguing that the court erred in concluding that his petition is barred as untimely under Minn. Stat. § 590.01, subds. 4(a)(1), (c) (2010), because he contends that he is entitled to one review of his conviction when matters of constitutional rights are involved. Under the United States and Minnesota Constitutions, a criminal defendant does not have an unlimited and absolute right to one review of a conviction, even when…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Michel v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bee Yang v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API