Bee Yang v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONNOLLY, Judge.
Appellant’s postconviction petition for relief was denied by the postconviction court on the ground that it was time-barred under Minn.Stat. § 590.01, subd. 4(c). He challenges that decision, contending that claims invoking the subdivision 4(b)(5) exception should not be subject to a two-year time limitation. We affirm.
FACTS
In 2005, pursuant to a plea agreement, appellant Bee Yang, pleaded guilty to one count of second-degree criminal sexual conduct in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.343, subd. 1(b) (2004). On January 24, 2006, appellant was sentenced and received a stay…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Leake v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Deegan v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Brua v. MINNESOTA JOINT UNDERWRITING ASS'NSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Hamilton v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dion Dalvante Harris v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014