Legal Opinion
(PC) Struggs v. Pfeiffer
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 25, 2019No. 1:18-cv-01336Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CEDRIC LYNN STRUGGS, 1:18-cv-01336-GSA-PC 12 Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER 13 vs. ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM AND 14 C. PFEIFFER, et al., VIOLATION OF RULE 18, WITH LEAVE TO AMEND 15 Defendants. (ECF No. 1.) 16 THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 17 18 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 Cedric Lynn Struggs (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil 21 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 27, 2018, Plaintiff filed the 22 Complaint commencing…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.