Legal Opinion
Gutenplan v. Dauman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 2, 1989PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and injury to property, the defendant Elaine Dauman appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Robbins, J.), dated April 6, 1988, which denied her motion for summary judgment based on a failure to comply with a conditional order of preclusion, on the condition that the plaintiffs’ attorney pay $750 to her as a sanction.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
By an order dated September 14, 1987, the appellant was granted an order of preclusion unless the plaintiffs served their bill of particulars within 45 days…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smith v. Lefrak Organization, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Paoli v. Sullcraft Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Smith v. Lefrak Organization, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Higgins v. Community HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Raphael v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Hertz Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Goldsmith Motors Corp. v. Chemical BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Callaghan v. CurtisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Bansi v. Flushing Hospital Medical CenterNew York Supreme Court · 2007
- Elliot v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.