Legal Opinion

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Hendricks

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 20, 1906PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action in assumpsit. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Adams County; the Hon. Albert Akers, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the May term, 1905.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Puterbaugh

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an action in assumpsit by appellee against appellant predicated upon a contract and certificate of membership issued by the Relief Department of the.Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company to Peter A. Hendricks and payable to appellee, his widow, as beneficiary. The Circuit Court overruled demurrers to certain of plaintiff’s replications. The defendant elected to abide by its said replications and refused to plead further, whereupon the court assessed the plaintiff’s damages at $777, and rendered judgment…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Keefe v. Women's Catholic Order of ForestersIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Covenant Mutual Life Ass'n v. KentnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. WymoreNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Williams v. AllisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  5. Pacaud v. WaiteIllinois Supreme Court · 1905

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Timmerhoff v. Supreme Tent of KnightsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API