Legal Opinion

Aguilera v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided February 6, 2002No. 04-00-00509-CRPublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PHIL HARDBERGER, Chief Justice.

Antonio Aguilera (“Aguilera”) was found guilty by a jury of three counts of indecency with a child and three counts of aggravated sexual assault. Aguilera presents nine issues in his brief, contending: (1) the jury was instructed pursuant to an “amended” but unaltered indictment; (2) hearsay statements were erroneously admitted; (3) evidence of the complainant’s prior sexual history was erroneously excluded; (4) an opinion regarding the truthfulness of the complainant was erroneously admitted; (5) “profile” evidence that Aguil-era was a “molester” and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Yount v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Riney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  4. Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Valenti v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Ross v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  2. Apolinar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  3. Bowden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
  4. Flores v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  5. In re J.G.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2006

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API