Legal Opinion

Apolinar v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided May 22, 2003No. 01-02-00659-CRPublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TIM TAFT, Justice.

A jury convicted appellant, Alex Apoli-nar, of aggravated robbery and assessed punishment at 35 years in prison and a $10,000 fíne. See Tex. Pen.Code Ann. §§ 29.03(a)-(b), 12.32 (Vernon 2003). We determine (1) whether the evidence was factually sufficient to show that appellant was the perpetrator; (2) whether the admission of extraneous-offense evidence at the punishment phase, if error, was harmful; (3) whether appellant carried his burden of showing that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to a voir dire statement by the trial court; (4) whether…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  5. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Apolinar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  2. Compton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  3. Brown v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
  4. Martinez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
  5. Luna v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2009

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API