Legal Opinion

People v. Mitts

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 17, 2001No. 1-98-2412PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNULTY

The prosecution charged defendant, Joecephus Mitts, with three separate sexual assaults that occurred in the Englewood area in an eight-day period. The jury found him guilty of two of the assaults, but not guilty of the third. Defendant appeals from his convictions and sentences.

Just before 7 a.m. on December 14, 1993, L.B. walked down Hoyne Street towards a bus stop on 55th Street. A man across the street, walking the opposite direction, began crossing the street just as she started to cross. As she walked past, the man grabbed her arm and said, “[T]his is a stickup.” He pulled out a gun and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. People v. WeaverIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  4. People v. ShawIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  5. People v. MitchellIllinois Supreme Court · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  2. People v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  3. People v. RinglandIllinois Supreme Court · 2017
  4. People v. RinglandIllinois Supreme Court · 2018
  5. People v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API