People v. Smith
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Mara Frossard
The issue on appeal involves defendant’s allegation of forensic fraud by serological expert Pamela Fish. Defendant’s successive post-conviction petition alleged: “Petitioner was denied his right to due process of law under the 14th amendment to the United States Constitution and section I, article 2 of the Constitution of the State of Illinois where the State presented the perjured testimony of criminalist Pamela Fish to secure the conviction of the petitioner.” U.S. Const, amend. XIV; Ill. Const. 1970, art. I, § 2. Defendant, in his petition, does not raise a claim of actual innocence;…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. EdwardsIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. OrtizIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. OrtizIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. AndersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- People v. MitchellAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
- People v. AndersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.