Legal Opinion

Thigpen v. Rothwell

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1970No. 8925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SISK, Justice.

Plaintiffs sued to foreclose a mortgage which secured a promissory note given by defendants in payment of the purchase price of the corporate stock of E. Cos-grove, Inc., which we will refer to as the corporation. Defendants admitted the indebtedness but claimed an offset based on certain taxes paid by them. The trial court ruled that defendants were not entitled to the offset and defendants have appealed from the judgment which granted to plaintiffs the full amount of the indebtedness.

Defendants contend that the trial court erred in making certain findings of fact and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McCauley v. RayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Cutter Flying Service, Inc. v. Straughan Chevrolet, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Woods v. City of HobbsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Ellis v. StoneNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Hondo Oil & Gas Co. v. Pan American Petroleum Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schultz & Lindsay Construction Co. v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Le Doux ex rel. Gallegos v. PetersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. GALLUP GAMERCO COAL COMPANY v. IrwinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Waxler v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Garcia v. HerreraNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API