Legal Opinion

State v. Sandoval

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 13, 2007No. 23754-1-IIIPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

154 P.3d 271 (2007)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Erik Robert SANDOVAL, Appellant.

No. 23754-1-III.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3.

March 13, 2007.

Janet G. Gemberling, Gemberling & Dooris PS, Spokane, WA, for Appellant.

Kevin Michael Korsmo, Attorney at Law, Spokane, WA, for Respondent.

BROWN, J.

¶ 1 First, considering medical diagnosis and excited utterance testimony, we reject Erik Sandoval's confrontation arguments in his appeal from his convictions for third degree assault-domestic violence and second degree malicious mischief. Second, the State's closing argument mentioning…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. SwanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. DhaliwalWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. DavenportWashington Supreme Court · 1984

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. SchaerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  2. Perry v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. State v. O'CainCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  4. State v. ScanlanWashington Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. HurtadoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API