Legal Opinion
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Hillhouse
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 6, 1945No. 30970PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
The assignment of error is general to the effect that the record discloses that there is no competent evidence to support the award, and that there is no evidence “at all to support the very foundation of the award.” The gist of this contention is based upon the ground that the director took into consideration hearsay testimony of Dr. Bailey, an employee of the Bell Aircraft Corporation in its clinic. Dr. Bailey was not sworn as a witness. Dr. Brown, who was also an employee of the Bell Aircraft Corporation along with Dr. Bailey in the clinic, was sworn as a witness. On the day of the alleged…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- American Mutual Liability Insurance v. SissonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. GriggsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Hall's Self-Feeding Cotton Gin Co. v. BlackSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- Sisson v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
- American Mutual Liability Insurance v. KentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- GENERAL ACCIDENT FIRE & LIFE ASSURANCE CORPORATION v. TealCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Fox v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Standard Accident Insurance v. HandspikeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947