Legal Opinion

Hall's Self-Feeding Cotton Gin Co. v. Black

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 27, 1883PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Corporations. Payment. Promissory Notes. Evidence. Principal and Agent. Before Judge Roney. Richmond Superior Court. October Adjourned Term, 1882. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Justice.

On March 18,1881, the gin company, in ‘writing under seal, signed by both parties, appointed Warren, Wallace & Co., composed of Warren, Wallace and Cranston, agents at Augusta, to sell its gins upon commission. The agents were to receive 25 per cent on all sales and an extra 10 per cent on all cash actually paid by December Ast.

The contract, among others, contained these provisions:

All sales by Warren, Wallace & Co. were to

“ Be for cash, or notes with lawful interest ^rom December 1st until *452paid. Drafts made payable to the order of, and guaranteed by the said party of the second…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kupferman v. McGeheeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  2. Weaver v. Nixon & WesterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Veal v. Security Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. Norton v. Paragon Oil Can Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  3. Council v. NunnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  4. Kinard v. First National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Shipp v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API