Legal Opinion

Carney v. Otis Elevator Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 25, 1988No. 278PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of appellee following a trial by jury. Appellant claims that it is entitled to either judgment in its favor because the trial evidence did not satisfy the elements of negligence; or, in the alternative, a new trial because the verdict was contrary to the weight of the evidence and because the trial court committed reversible error during the course of the trial. For reasons discussed below, we affirm the decision of the trial court.

The trial court presented the facts as follows.... On May 17, 1982, at approximately 4:00…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Gilbert v. Korvette's Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. MymaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Burrell v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Atkins v. Urban Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Allendorf v. Kaiserman EnterprisesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  2. Giles v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Shah v. State Board of MedicineCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Sedlitsky v. ParesoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Micciche v. Eastern Elevator Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API