Legal Opinion
Harburg Medical Sales Co. v. Bureau of Workers' Compensation
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 15, 2006PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge FRIEDMAN.
Harburg Medical Sales Co. (Provider) petitions for review of the June 29, 2006, order of the Department of Labor and Industry (Department), Bureau of Workers’ Compensation (Bureau) Fee Review Hearing Officer, which denied and dismissed without prejudice Provider’s fee review application (Application). We affirm.
Eric R. Ratner, M.D., diagnosed Denise Heister (Claimant) with work-related chronic lower back pain due to displaced discs and, on November 9, 2004, prescribed “a Tempur-Pedic mattress queen size with frame and foundation” to help with sleep. 1 (R.R. at 9a.)…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Laundry Owners Mutual Liability Insurance Ass'n v. Bureau of Workers' CompensationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Royal Insurance v. Department of Labor & Industry, Bureau of Workers' CompensationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jaeger v. Bureau of Workers' Compensation Fee Review Hearing OfficeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Co. v. Bureau of Workers' CompensationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- SWIF v. Bureau of WC Fee Review Hearing Office (Harburg Medical Sales Co., Inc. & S. Lam, MD)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019